Skip to content
VergeLabs

Insights

Writing on AI you can account for.

Articles, whitepapers and the occasional note. On sources, sign-off, and what holds up in the thinking professions.

Voor wie
Education and learning materialsConsulting and strategyPublishers and editorial teamsResearch and think tanksBBEbuddyBookaflowValoraEducation and learning materialsConsulting and strategyPublishers and editorial teamsResearch and think tanksBBEbuddyBookaflowValora

Article · 13 October 2026 · 6 min read

Six questions to put to an AI vendor

Six questions to send in writing before the demo, one for each layer of TRACES, with what a usable answer looks like and what an evasive one sounds like.

Read

Article · 13 October 2026 · 6 min read

Sorting a workflow: which steps AI may do

"Can we use AI?" is a question you answer step by step, not for the work as a whole. Three questions and three bins for sorting a workflow.

Read

Article · 13 October 2026 · 6 min read

An AI work policy that fits on one page

A policy nobody reads decides nothing. Six blocks on one A4 page, with the question each block answers, and a worked example.

Read

Article · 13 October 2026 · 6 min read

What to record when you work with AI

Five fields that make a step with AI traceable, even a year later. What belongs in them, what doesn't, and how the trail builds itself.

Read

Article · 13 October 2026 · 6 min read

Which changes need a substantive judgement

Not every change to a text deserves the same attention. A three-bin test for deciding which changes need a subject-matter judgement and which can simply be read along.

Read

Article · 13 October 2026 · 6 min read

Testing a knowledge assistant with questions that have no answer

An assistant that answers good questions well proves little. A test set of twenty questions, half with no answer in your sources, shows whether it can also say it doesn't know.

Read

Article · 13 October 2026 · 6 min read

Setting up an AI pilot you can decide on afterwards

Many pilots end with "it went quite well" and then nothing happens. A pilot card with six fields, filled in beforehand, means you can choose between continuing, adjusting and stopping when it's over.

Read

Article · 13 October 2026 · 6 min read

What a school board asks before teachers get an AI tool

A board that has to say yes or no to an AI tool gets more from six written questions than from a demo. Each question comes with the document the school itself should have ready.

Read

Article · 13 October 2026 · 6 min read

Letting teachers use AI without giving away student data

An agreement that teachers won't put student data into a chatbot gets broken in a busy week. What works instead: swap the data out before the prompt, and set up the environment so it's also technically hard to do.

Read

Article · 13 October 2026 · 6 min read

Assessing a report that was made with AI

A report full of AI errors looks just as polished as a good one. A sample check on the sources shows the difference, and takes an afternoon.

Read

Article · 13 October 2026 · 6 min read

The AI paragraph in a bid or tender

Nearly every AI paragraph in a proposal promises responsible use and says nothing else. A paragraph of four sentences, one per SEAL phase, does say something.

Read

Article · 13 October 2026 · 6 min read

Checking an AI summary for shifted meaning

A summary can be right in every detail and still claim more than its source. A three-point check for newsrooms that let AI summarise.

Read

Article · 13 October 2026 · 6 min read

Carrying a correction through everything built on the same source

One error in a source soon sits in five or ten pieces of content. Fix it in one place and the rest stays wrong. A list you build at publication solves that.

Read

Article · 13 October 2026 · 6 min read

Removing invented sources from a literature review before delivery

An AI literature review contains references that look right and don't exist. A three-step check, per reference, and a log you can hand over with the work.

Read

Article · 13 October 2026 · 6 min read

Checking the step from finding to recommendation

The findings are right, but the recommendation goes further than they carry. A support table shows, for each recommendation, where the leap is and who gets to make it.

Read

The Working Session, € 399.

Ninety minutes with the core team along your own workflow. Where it may go faster, and where credibility is at stake. You get one A4 with three observations and one recommendation. The amount is credited against a scan within three months.

The Working Session

Intro call, free.

A half-hour conversation about where your hours go. We won't chase you afterwards. You'll know whether this is for you, and so will we.

Book an intro call

The Accountability Scan, fixed price.

We go through your AI use and knowledge work. What is demonstrable, where the gaps are, where the routine work sits and what it costs. You get a report in plain language, with an order of attack and a cost estimate. The report is yours, whether we continue together or not.

The AI Accountability Scan
After that: setting up a tool, training a team, or building a system. And when it pays off, a standing partnership in which we review the AI use at set intervals and you get a written report each time. What that involves is in the offer.See the offer
VergeLabs

© 2026 VergeLabs